Product & Engineering · PI 11 Close-Out
prolaio

PI 11 · we committed less, and kept more of it

All five teams · 22 July – 14 October 2026 · six sprints · benchmarked against PI 10 and PI 9
Sprint goals hit
83.6%
61 of 73 — first PI above the 80% target
76.3% → 76.2% → 83.6%
Velocity
680
points — third PI of decline, −9% since PI 9
746 → 708 → 680
Demand ÷ capacity
192%
twice the work we can do — flat for four PIs
205% → 196% → 192%
Output per engineer
96
index vs PI 10 — second consecutive fall, on a flat roster
PI 10 · 93  →  PI 11 · 96
Promises kept vs work completed
Goal achievement cleared the 80% target in PI 11; velocity fell for a third PI.
By team
Goals hit · plan size against capacity · points per head vs their own PI 10
TeamGoalsDemandPts / head
Cloud 17/19227%121
Data 6/7195%94
Fusion 19/19197%79
Mobile 12/21227%76
Web 7/7116%112
All teams61/73192%96
Points per head compares each team against its own PI 10 average, never against each other — story points are not comparable between teams. 100 = unchanged.
Mobile accounts for 8 of the org's 12 missed goals — six of them the same two items restated across three sprints. Web is the only team planning inside its capacity, and it hit everything. The teams closest to 100% demand are the teams keeping their promises.
All five teams · goals as of 16 Oct 2026
Rates exclude the IP sprint; counts include it
Source · BigQuery prolaio-engineering-metrics